Annex 25 acres off CR 161 and zone it for small-setback homes
Got a city notice about 26-0023Z? Follow it to the final vote for $15.
- A comment letter drafted for your position (support, oppose or concerns), emailed within one business day, ready to edit and send.
- An email if Council defers it (with the new date) and when Council decides.
- One payment, no subscription. If the case is withdrawn before a vote, you get a full refund.
Order by Sun Oct 4 to get your letter before the Mon Oct 5 Council hearing; if Council defers the case, it's redrafted for the new date. Secure checkout by Stripe.
What's proposed
Two linked requests. Case 26-0008A asks the city to annex the land, with an annexation facilities agreement and service plan. Case 26-0023Z zones it "PD" Planned Development for single-family homes based on the R-5 and R-3 districts, but with lower standards. Front setbacks would drop from 15 ft to 5 ft. Screening along the rear and side lines would go, and an alternative device would replace it on the thoroughfare frontage. Canopy trees in front yards would become ornamental trees, with the rest moved to common areas.
Staff recommendation
"Denial of the proposed zoning request." Staff says the PD only reduces standards and offers no public benefit, and would support the case if it were plain "R3" Residential, which fits the Comprehensive Plan. The staff report also recommends approval of the annexation, but elsewhere recommends denial of the annexation agreement and ordinance (see Watch for).
Who it helps or hurts
Five-foot front yards and no rear or side screening mean a denser street wall with fewer shade trees. Single-family homes lie to the north and south. Multifamily-zoned land (MF36) lies to the north, and it gets no screening from new homes.
Annexation brings city utilities, roads and fees to the area, which helps nearby land values. A precedent of reduced standards could ease other PDs, or push the city to hold the line on later cases. Commercial PD land lies to the west and east.
Within about 1,000 feet
Floodplain and open space to the west (PD 2013-12-112/113). Institutional, commercial and single-family uses to the east (PD 2025-06-051).
Watch for
- Staff opposes the zoning, but the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 on June 23, 2026. Council can side with either. A denial or a switch to R3 is a real possibility.
- The staff report contradicts itself on the annexation. Its summary recommends approval, but the body recommends denial of the facilities agreement and annexation ordinance. Ask which it is before you comment.
- No letters of support or opposition, and no online comments, so far.
- If annexed, the land pays city property tax and any agricultural exemption triggers five years of rollback taxes when it develops.
Next step
This is the final City Council action on both the annexation and the zoning; the commission already voted in June.
Source
City staff report on the McKinney Legistar file, case 26-0008A/26-0023Z (source PDF) · P&Z video: source PDF
Only the cases near you, every week, across DFW. $40/month.